Test drove a 2014 Mercedes-Benz CLA250 today (review) - Mercedes CLA Forum
User Tag List

 1Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 13 Old 11-02-2013, 07:14 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
SimpsonTide985's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 165
(Thread Starter)
Test drove a 2014 Mercedes-Benz CLA250 today (review)

If you've got stuff to do, just scroll to the Summary at the bottom.





I've spent the last 8 months or so on a tear leading up to the inevitable end of my G37 lease. There's been a lot of controversy over the Mercedes-Benz CLA and in some way, I think I've been caught up in the hype as much as everyone else. The CLA is truly in a class of its own; the first FWD from Mercedes, 208hp and 258lb-ft of torque, 4-door coupe-like design and more importantly a starting price around $30k. Sounds like a winner right? Well who here knows for sure?--So I figured I'd make time today and spent a good 25 minutes of my time with the car (I would have spent more time with it but we'll get into that later).


The CLA250 I drove was a Polar Silver metallic with Black MB-Tex with Anthracite trim. Now, this was a pretty stripped down model and the only options were the Panorama Sunroof and BECKER Pilot wiring unit. MSRP was around $33,300. Of course I wanted to test drive a CLA with all of the trimmings (none were currently available until next week), but I opted to go ahead and spend a little bit of time anyway with the car just to get a feel of the car inside and out and to get a good look at it.




As I mentioned, this CLA250 was pretty much a glorified base model. This meant no Leather package, no premium sound, no heated seats, no navigation or rear view camera, no parking sensors, no Bi-Xenon headlights or fancy LED tail lights. The only significant features of any note outside of the beautiful panaroma sunroof are the car's standard 17" wheels, 3-memory seating for the driver and passenger, paddle shifters, ECO start/stop system, and collision prevention assist.



Pros:
-Immediately you'll notice how the CLA design overall heavily invokes the feeling and presence of a mini-CLS sedan, which is a good thing as it's Mercedes' best looking sedan IMO. It has a very beefy yet elegant stance with what I feel are better proportions than the C-class. It sits a bit lower than the C-class and invokes strong front Mercedes end and ultimately gives the appearance of a more expensive car.

-For a compact of this size, it's pretty decent inside. It has a cockpit effect without feeling entirely claustrophobic. The rear legroom especially was better than expected but there is a compromise which I'll get to later. Also, many of you might be lucky to hear that the CLA has pretty good outward visibility despite its low roofline and it also has quite the nice sized trunk with non-intrusive gooseneck arms. It also has a 60/40 fold-down rear seat but no pass through (as I can recall anyway).




-The Mercedes command knob takes very little time to get used to. It's pretty intuitive and simple for navigating the menu screen (which is only 5.5" without the Multimedia package). There's just enough buttons on the center console--everything is large, clear, and the buttons feel good to the touch. The tablet-like menu unit looks very clean and crisp with good resolution. Navigating the infotainment screen is pretty simple. I was able to pair up my Bluetooth audio with my Windows phone in just 30 seconds or so and there are a couple of small storage areas to keep your phone in if your cupholders are currently full.




-As for the driving itself, the car did quite well. The car has a Eco, Standard, Manual, and Sport mode which can be toggled pretty easily. It also has an ECO feature that will save power and gas by starting/stopping the car if the engine gets too hot or if you're in stop and go traffic. You'll probably be able to get a really good rating of at least 30 mpg combined utilizing the ECO feature.

-Despite it being slightly slower than what I'm used to, the nice delta of the 258lb-ft of torque makes up for it. Passing is near effortless in this regard, especially in Manual (M) mode where the car reacts to downshifts very quickly with little to no lag or torque steer. Due to the smooth sounding engine and transmission, which is never grinding, the car seems faster than it actually is and it never feels like it's struggling to get up to speed. It's a really good 7-speed DCT if I must say so myself! As for the ride, it's stiff and sporty but not overly harsh. It's somewhat comparable to the ride in my G37s. Interior noise is decently controlled and the brakes are up to par.







Cons:
-Right off the bat, there's no push button start. Like many Mercedes these days, it still requires the use of inserting and turning of a keyfob to start. These days, that's a pretty big deal. I also noticed that the steering of the car at low speeds was lighter than I'm used to--perhaps it's not a CON-con per se. Most cars these days have variable speed steering now and with that said, the car is definitely much lighter at lower speeds than I personally would've liked. Combined with the chassis of the car which I noticed is a little nose-heavy due to the FWD drivetrain, it's not quite like driving a true performance sedan by any stretch.

-To no surprise, the CLA probably isn't the best car for those over 6'3". Headroom may become a little on the tight side given its roof line. The backseat legroom might be good but it's the headroom that really suffers. I'm 5'10" and I felt that I was maybe within 1-2 inches of hitting my head on the roof. Definitely not the kind of car you'll want if you plan on transporting a lot of taller/large adults.




-All CLAs come standard with paddle shifters which is great--however, the paddles move WITH the steering wheel which, probably wouldn't be too much of an issue for me if the car had the manual gearshifter down in the center tunnel, which it does not. Instead, the normal shifting on the CLA is on a stalk attached to the steering column as with many Mercedes. This means that the only way to manually shift through the gears is through the paddles. For me, I really prefer shifting using a shifter on the tunnel versus the paddles and if I want to use paddles, I'd prefer them to be stationary so that they're always where I want them to be.

-As for the interior, aesthetically speaking, outside of the panorama roof, it doesn't have the same kind of wow factor as the exterior. The verdict is still out in this area I suppose. Granted, I haven't seen the car in its more fancy trims such as the Brown/Ash Leather, Black Ash wood, Walnut Burl wood, or Aluminum. Even with that said, as it is right now in its lowest form, the actual materials themselves never felt like they belonged in a much cheaper car but they're likely to disappoint those looking for E or maybe C-class grade quality.

-Maybe this is a nitpick of mine, but the seating control buttons on the side of the doors from Mercedes has always bothered me. They can take quite a while to get used to and I don't like them all that much. Maybe it's just me, I'm not sure, but they just don't feel intuitive and easy to understand. It feels like one of those things that Mercedes has refused to change in their vehicles and has now become synonymous with a luxury car.






Summary


Looks: 7.75/10 (The CLA's design feels fresh but yet still familiar. I think Mercedes-Benz did a nice job using a design language that has worked very well for them already in the CLS and create a legitimately solid looking compact sedan that looks its price and maybe moreso. The exterior definitely is where it shines the most and will definitely be the standout in the compact sedan segment. On the inside, while still good, is definitely where more of the cutting of the corners becomes evident. The verdict is still ultimately out on this until I get to sit inside and feel the available Leather and wood options.)

Performance: 8.25/10 (The CLA has what I would call an excellent middleground of practical and usable everyday power. The chassis and steering is good for a FWD car with this much torque. The handling is tight and rides firm but never harsh. The 7-speed Dual Clutch transmission is quick through the gears and it's probably the car's best feature. It really did feel very reminiscent of driving an Audi A5 but with only a slightly less balanced chassis and steering feel which is still a nice compliment for Mercedes IMO)

Personal Practicality and Appeal: 7.25/10 (The CLA will get a ton of notice and popularity very quickly, both for its price and for brand recognition. With that said, I'm also being a little cautious as I feel the CLA250 is going to be a very ubiquitous car on the road very soon which may hurt resale. For me, if you can get this car for around $37k/$38k, I'd say it's a winner in the segment. Once you get to $40k or higher, you may want to start looking for something a little bit more upscale for the money. Outside of that, the CLA is still a decently put together car. I like its outside dimensions, the panaroma roof, and its overall presence. Fuel economy is also very good at a combined 30 MPG. It has good trunk space, decent visibility, and of course, the 3-point star.)

**Options/Tech: TBD/10 (Since this was a base model, I am going to leave this blank unfortunately. Not being able to test the Nav system, the premium sound, the parking sensors, voice control, and media interface are big and I don't think it'd be fair to score the car in this section. I'll try to come back and rate those options separately when I get the chance.)





Overall: TBD/10**


Bottom Line: If you're on a $38k budget and you're looking for a well equipped FWD near luxury car with spirited driving dynamics for real world, everyday driving, the CLA definitely needs to be on your list of possibles. It's not the car you'd want to have necessarily if you're looking for a ton of practical space or to wow people with its interior, but I'd see it being perfect for singles or a young couple looking to show off their status.

**I'm likely to test drive the car again once I find one with a few more packages and options on it. Then I'll come back to update the score. As for now, it gets a 7.8/10 based on Looks, Performance, and Practicality/Appeal.
vracer likes this.

Last edited by SimpsonTide985; 11-03-2013 at 07:55 PM.
SimpsonTide985 is offline  
Enjoy this discussion? You might also enjoy ...
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mercedes-Benz : Other CLA250 2014 MB CLA250 P88 EDITION 1 NAV HARMON/KARDON TURBO FRN Mercedes CLA Parts Mercedes CLA Items for Sale on Ebay Classifieds 0 11-06-2013 04:30 PM
Mercedes-Benz : Other CLA250 1st edition 2014 CLA250 Turbo 2L I4 Automatic Naviagtio Mercedes CLA Parts Mercedes CLA Items for Sale on Ebay Classifieds 0 10-28-2013 03:21 PM
Has Anyone Else Bought Or Test Drove One?? Soccerdog New 2014+ CLA General Discussion Forum 62 10-09-2013 12:36 PM
2014 Mercedes-Benz CLA250 Review from CarConnection ViceCity New 2014+ Mercedes CLA Videos 3 09-07-2013 07:25 PM
Hypebeast Takes the New 2014 Mercedes-Benz CLA for a Test Drive brianch New 2014+ Mercedes CLA Videos 2 04-03-2013 12:57 PM

Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 13 Old 11-02-2013, 11:05 PM
Senior Member
 
claNOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 176
Good review, thanks for posting.

Quote:
-Maybe this is a nitpick of mine, but the seating control buttons on the side of the doors from Mercedes has always bothered me. They can take quite a while to get used to and I don't like them all that much. Maybe it's just me, I'm not sure, but they just don't feel intuitive and easy to understand. It feels like one of those things that Mercedes has refused to change in their vehicles.
This comment was a surprise. My view has been that Mercedes seat controls are intuitive because you can view the diagram in your line of sight as you adjust the seat, rather than fumbling with one's fingers near the seat base and adjusting on feel alone.

I wager that you would get used to the controls in short order. Mercedes has been installing seat controls like this for decades.
claNOW is offline  
post #3 of 13 Old 11-02-2013, 11:58 PM
Super Moderator

 
vracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Just N. of the Golden Gate
Posts: 198
Simpson,
Thanks for what may be the most complete and reasoned report we have read. The time you spent on this is really appreciated.

Please go to your cp and list your location. This is a multinational forum, and cars from Slovakia are not the same as Belgium or the US.
vracer is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 13 Old 11-03-2013, 09:30 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
SimpsonTide985's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 165
(Thread Starter)
I enjoy writing

I'm not very good at it but I get a lot out of it.

I have written other reviews on other comparable vehicles (335i, ATS, A5, etc.). I just don't know the right place to post them.
SimpsonTide985 is offline  
post #5 of 13 Old 11-03-2013, 09:42 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: ohio
Posts: 14
Great review! I appreciate the time you spent on it
tjames6410 is offline  
post #6 of 13 Old 11-03-2013, 05:40 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
SimpsonTide985's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 165
(Thread Starter)
This dealership is having a big sales event next weekend and they're pulling out a ton of CLAs with all of the other fancy options and colors on it.

I'm gonna try and see if I can make it out for that.

Oh a side note, my ATS review is up

Last edited by SimpsonTide985; 11-03-2013 at 05:56 PM.
SimpsonTide985 is offline  
post #7 of 13 Old 11-04-2013, 12:27 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 437
Gahh!!! I don't wanna see a picture of a white CLA!! Makes me want mine sooner!!

But wow, you really did go for a basic one. All the ones I've seen (granted, not a lot) were at least 37k. You're right, the smaller screen really isn't all that noticeably smaller. In fact, I thought it was the big one at first glance. The picture makes the steering wheel look a lot bigger than I remember it as well. It looks tight in the pictures too, tighter than I remember. But then again I like snug fits and small cars over big cars. But looking at the pictures even I'm a bit turned off. All the more reason to try it out yourself though.

How do you like the sunroof. I actually didn't like the idea to begin with and when I got in one I really didn't like how it looked punched out of the roof.

By the way, how stable is the screen. Is it easily detachable or moveable (like at a better viewing angle)? I didn't get much time to play with the actual screen itself.
sleepyhead is offline  
post #8 of 13 Old 11-04-2013, 12:33 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
SimpsonTide985's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 165
(Thread Starter)
It's not White, it was the Polar Silver. It's quite the bright silver tone...and it was literally the one and only CLA250 they had to test at the moment.

I never touched the screen, but I'm pretty sure it's completely stationary and cannot be adjusted.

I'm not sure what you mean by the roof being punched out. Maybe panorama roofs aren't your cup of tea but I thought it was amazing. It felt like being in a spaceship or somethin.
SimpsonTide985 is offline  
post #9 of 13 Old 11-04-2013, 12:52 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 437
Quote:
Originally Posted by SimpsonTide985 View Post
I'm not sure what you mean by the roof being punched out. Maybe panorama roofs aren't your cup of tea but I thought it was amazing. It felt like being in a spaceship or somethin.
What I mean is that there is a large depression in the roof where the sunroof is. You can imagine the roof would be over an inch thicker if there was no sunroof. Also I find it rather ugly on the inside when closed.

I actually don't mind sunroofs and in some cars they are quite nice. But when I was test driving a 250 I heard it creak during "aggressive" turning during a test drive. You can imagine that it wasn't all that aggressive since it was a test drive. That bothers me. Especially since I am not buying the 250 but the AMG. I would not want the reduced rigidity, extra weight, and higher center of gravity for a sunroof I don't find all that appealing to begin with. On a car with as little power as the 250 (or the 200 or 180s) I think a sunroof would be fine. Though I still wouldn't get it since, like I said, I don't like the look from the inside.
sleepyhead is offline  
post #10 of 13 Old 11-04-2013, 01:05 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
SimpsonTide985's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 165
(Thread Starter)
Hey, a $32k car is going to give you a creak every now and again. The 45AMG is based on a $30k platform and so I'd better get used to hearing a little creaking from time to time.
SimpsonTide985 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome